Bernard wrote:central locking, elec folding mirrors, ABS
All useful IMO.
Depends on your piorities really.
If I wanted a comfortable GT car then I wouldn't choose an FTO. IMHO at this stage of its life cycle - the less equipment that can go wrong the better - and the less weight - the purer the driving experience.
Hence when I owned my last FTO I removed the climate control including cooling fan and brackets (less engine load to boot) and also removed spare, tools, rear seats and various other smaller pieces (heat sheilding, unneccessary brackets etc) and together with a lighter exhaust and rims contributed to the best part of 100kgs weight loss from the FTO. Upgrade suspension and brakes and you'll have a car that even my present Zed doesn't come near for a pure driving experience and was very nearly as quick with substantially less power.
Modern Cars (like my Zed) are totally overburdened with safety (8 airbags, Stability control, ABS, traction, EBD, extensive crash protection and crumple zones etc) and unnessessary extra equipment (heated electric leather seats (v v heavy), climate control, massive ICE, Sat Nav etc etc leading to the modern sports coupe being 300kgs heavier than the FTO and totally dilluting the feel of a sports car.
I'm not saying that cars like the Zed etc are not good sports cars - but I do feel that modern manufacturers have lost sight of what makes a good sports coupe. For those of you that wonder if a Zeds performance is worth an extra 20-30K over an FTO - then the simple answer is it most certainly is not.
I look forward to the day where I can strip a Zed down to 1200kgs and enjoy the subsequent thrills. The only thing thats stopping me is the loss of potential value of my car - no such problem with the FTO.