Myfeckin FTO wrote:I'd prefer if the government actually got rid of VRT and CO2 tax etc and just increased the charge on petrol. A fairer system all round - you pay according to the amount of petrol you burn (and hence road useage and CO2 you create).
Sounds like a great system, but it would push the consumer price index so out of kilter that they'd never realistically do it. It'd be great to have half a dozen cars in the garage and drive whatever one you fancied, you wouldn't be using any more fuel than if you had one car.
kevinod wrote:We should do more and more 'petrol/diesel free days' to make a point if nothing else, although they'd prob just push up the prices again 'cos their profits went down.
.
These petrol free days are a waste of time, petrol isn't something you buy on a whim, if you don't buy it on a Tuesday, you'll have to buy it on Wednesday. The petrol companies know we need to drive, and it's a sellers market unfortunately.
d_dan wrote:If anyone is considering it when I got the gpx remapped and its about 20-25% more economical
This could be more of a reflection of the bad fuel economy your car was doing before the map. what sort of mpg are you getting now?
This €2k a year thing mightn't be an issue to those spending €60k on a new 350z, but it's gonna be an issue in 5 or 6 years time when a good few of the people on this forum will be looking at used ones!
What sickens me is that a small increase in the net price of fuel translated to a large increase at the pumps once the government take their huge tax chunk of it. Revenue could intervene and reduce the duty on fuel to such a level that they are making the same amount per litre in tax as they were 2 years ago. but why would they?
Maybe FTO DI-D conversions seem far fetched at the moment, but we could end up like Cuba, with their American classics with Lada engines because they have no other viable way to keep their cars on the road!