Moderator: Moderators
Diddler wrote:Thats handy if you don't have the equipment, but what if i wanted to put in a on-board computer?
What software would i use? What connection would i need to connect it to my laptop?
steelroe wrote:I will also soon have cheap little diagnostic code readers for sale, digital readout. very small and compact and can be left plugged in at all times.
CJ wrote:All a diagnostics post will throw out are stored messages in the form of electrical pulses
CJ wrote:Diddler, looks like I was wrong
CJ wrote:CJ wrote:Diddler, looks like I was wrong
...and just to prove how wrong I was, I bought one of these lads on Ebay!:
kevinod wrote:Think I read somewhere (could even be on here) that around 93 Mitsubishi took the OBD-II protocol while it was still being developed, and implemented it, which is the MUT-II. Could be wrong but think I read that somewhere.
CJ wrote:kevinod wrote:Think I read somewhere (could even be on here) that around 93 Mitsubishi took the OBD-II protocol while it was still being developed, and implemented it, which is the MUT-II. Could be wrong but think I read that somewhere.
You certainly didn't hear that on here, the MUT-II is a Mitsi diagnostic machine! The diagnostic port on all FTOs is OBD-II compliant.
CJ
Mustang wrote:Did you see in the link the section to do with 'vehicle conflicts and exclusions' in particular the section on tiptronic transmissions. I realise they mention Audi but they seem to be referring to tiptronic transmissions in general.......
steelroe wrote:Sorry to contradict you CJ but the FTO is not OBD-II compiant
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests