Moderator: Moderators
welcome to the club!
I have had a lot of experience of writing letters to Meath Coco for tyre/car damage over the past few years, and to be quite honest with you opticalillusion, (and this kills me to admit!), i have given up!
Approx 6 damaged alloys on two of our cars, same amount of tyres, one broken strut, one cracked shock, alloy repair fees and tow fees, evidence (photos, receipts, measurements and even witness accounts!)... and in all my time, i haven't got a penny back from Meath Coco!
You wont get anywhere via the legal route either, (im sorry to say) and it will end up costing you solicitor fees in the end if you press ahead... believe me, i know.
They will just claim non feasance (act of god). Give any local solicitor a ring on monday and they will confirm this.
One of my costly potholes was even marked for repair (yellow road paint circled) when i hit it but they still claimed non feasance
I would put it down to experience and move on unfortunately, as i can confirm that you wont see a penny from the feckers!
P.s. Jesus, that is quite a bad hole! are they burying anyone in it? (its fecking deep enough!)
optical illusion wrote:Letter I'm sending tomorrow:
With regard to Ref: one can only base ones defence on non-feasance if there have not been any previous repairs to the location. It is clear from the photographic evidence supplied that the pothole in question was repaired at some point and it is the repair/reinstatement that has failed. From the evidence supplied it is also clear that the surface has collapsed due to this patch of road having been worked on before - possibly after laying pipes or cables. It is obvious that the pothole has appeared due to the negligence of the council in repairing it previously. I ask you to reconsider your decision based on the above information. I will pursue this claim further if a satisfactory outcome is not achieved.
I'm also contacting Joe Duffy, I'll keep ye updated!!!
mcgon1979 wrote:But a road authority are liable for negligence in the execution of their duty. In other words, they are liable for misfeasance.
Section 60 will provide certain statutory defences for a road authority; and the factors to which regard must be had in determining whether a road is adequately maintained are set out.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest