SatNav Speed?

Use this forum to discuss anything and everything non-FTO related

Moderator: Moderators

Postby johnny » Mon Oct 22, 2007 3:02 pm

As far as I'm aware nearly all speedos over-read....as in give you a higher reading. I could be wrong, but I think in Germany the car manufacturers are obliged to have no more than a 10% error...and I think thats more or less adopted by all manufacturers.

Anybody from an engineering background (me) will tell you that any type of measurement device will have an error. The less you want the error (ie more accurate reading) the more the sensor will cost. Ergo, car manufacturers try to use as cheap and as basic measurement device as possible.

Im not sure how accurate the GPS systems are mind you....
johnny
FTO nut!
FTO nut!
 
Posts: 224
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 2:40 pm
Location: Dublin

Postby colm_mcm » Mon Oct 22, 2007 3:50 pm

car manufacturers overstate the speed because it eliminates risk of the speedo understating speed and creating all sorts of problems for themselves.
Image
colm_mcm
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5991
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 9:09 pm
Location: Location, Location

Postby kevinod » Mon Oct 22, 2007 5:21 pm

Is there much in the difference between the 2?
Steel Silver manual GR (95 C)
User avatar
kevinod
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 3336
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: Cork

Postby mcgon1979 » Mon Oct 22, 2007 5:56 pm

couple of those big signs on the M50 that say "YOUR SPEED IS ?? KPH" as you approach the 60KPH zone near the N3 exit. I have approached them several times at a steady constant speed and the speed they give (from radar) is always about 10% slower than my speedo reads.. I am on standard tyres and rims.
User avatar
mcgon1979
Fight The Octopus!
Fight The Octopus!
 
Posts: 1516
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 2:39 pm
Location: Dublin

Postby ikeane » Mon Oct 22, 2007 7:38 pm

This is all very interesting :twisted:

I figure I already keep it barely legal, no point in pushing it...yet
User avatar
ikeane
FTO is my life
FTO is my life
 
Posts: 293
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 9:47 pm
Location: Limerick

Postby colm_mcm » Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:13 pm

the faster you go, the more out the clocks go. so that top speed you've got on your car is actually a good bit lower than you thought!
Image
colm_mcm
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5991
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 9:09 pm
Location: Location, Location

Postby Sebastian » Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:58 pm

100 on the clocks shows 97-98 on my satnav.

i'm not bothered .




on the |YOUR SPEED| signs shows lower than the dials as well 1-2-3 kms

i'm not bothered ...
Yet ...Is this a good way to trick the speed cameras or your mind ? :lol:
no1. manual GR 96 l no2. tip GR 95 l no3. manual Gpx 95 l no.4 manual Gpx 95 l no.5 manual Gpx 96 l no.6 tip GR 95 - in 2011 took a break from the FTO scene
User avatar
Sebastian
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4862
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 2:09 pm
Location: Citywest , Dublin

Postby colm_mcm » Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:29 pm

your wheels are larger rolling radius than standard though Seb.
Image
colm_mcm
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5991
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 9:09 pm
Location: Location, Location

Re: SatNav Speed?

Postby Daz » Tue Oct 23, 2007 5:24 am

gfalls wrote:I have satnav in the car. When I'm driving along I can set it to tell me what speed I'm going. Thing is, it always reads slower than the speedo dial in the car. Question being. Which one is more accurate? I'm driving with standard wheels so that's not interfering with the speedo. It could be the difference of getting a speeding ticket or not. Anyone got any thoughts?? :D


Sat nav is more accurate and don't forget to factor in wear and tear on the speedo linkages cogs ect.

Daz...
Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive, anyway.
18 yrs an owner presently on my 4th a Manual Gpx with twin turbo conversion, in Daytona Blue
User avatar
Daz
Financially Troubled & Overdrawn!
Financially Troubled & Overdrawn!
 
Posts: 1332
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2003 10:47 pm
Location: Ex Carlow - now Liverpool

Postby colm_mcm » Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:54 am

The speedo on the FTO isn't mechanical, so no linkages.

Re: Sebs car, if it was on standard wheels with a smaller outside radius, the speedo would be reading 100kmph but the satnav instead of reading 97-98 , it'd be reading 94-95
Image
colm_mcm
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5991
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 9:09 pm
Location: Location, Location

Postby mcgon1979 » Tue Oct 23, 2007 11:45 am

Does sat nav only measure lateral movement? If your driving up a 30 degree incline at 100kph the sat nav would only detect 80kph movement if it thought you were driving on level ground? Does it take that into affect too? Where as a read from the wheels directly is accurate regardless of hills.
User avatar
mcgon1979
Fight The Octopus!
Fight The Octopus!
 
Posts: 1516
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 2:39 pm
Location: Dublin

Postby d_andrews78 » Tue Oct 23, 2007 12:37 pm

gfalls wrote:
mcgon1979 wrote:Does sat nav only measure lateral movement? If your driving up a 30 degree incline at 100kph the sat nav would only detect 80kph movement if it thought you were driving on level ground? Does it take that into affect too? Where as a read from the wheels directly is accurate regardless of hills.


Good point. Over to the physics boffins for an answer on that one. Any physics boffins on the forum?? :D :smt115


But most Nat Nav or All GPS systems will also tell you the level as well.
some hand held gps locators claim that they can be to within +/-10mm in all directions.
Lots to think about, nothing to worry about!
95 Mivec-Now a Clio replica & a 1.2 engine conversion.
User avatar
d_andrews78
FTO nut!
FTO nut!
 
Posts: 168
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:53 am
Location: Belfast

Postby mcgon1979 » Tue Oct 23, 2007 12:56 pm

thats very good if thats the case. I didn't think they were altimeters as well as 2d lat/long locator's. If a car sat nav took all those points and calculated your movement based on the 3 dimensions it would be highly accurately and could even give you a real-time climb rate as you drove up a hill. :roll:
User avatar
mcgon1979
Fight The Octopus!
Fight The Octopus!
 
Posts: 1516
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 2:39 pm
Location: Dublin

Postby colm_mcm » Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:24 pm

mcgon1979 wrote:Does sat nav only measure lateral movement? If your driving up a 30 degree incline at 100kph the sat nav would only detect 80kph movement if it thought you were driving on level ground? Does it take that into affect too? Where as a read from the wheels directly is accurate regardless of hills.


The new Pioneer head-unit satnavs have a tilt sensor so they can calculate distance travelled and speed better.
Image
colm_mcm
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5991
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 9:09 pm
Location: Location, Location

Postby d_andrews78 » Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:26 pm

I got my Dad a Garmin Sat nav last xmas out of halfords and it has that feature, think he's even tested it in a helecopter, he works on them (we don't own one). Think he said it wasn't far out.
Lots to think about, nothing to worry about!
95 Mivec-Now a Clio replica & a 1.2 engine conversion.
User avatar
d_andrews78
FTO nut!
FTO nut!
 
Posts: 168
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:53 am
Location: Belfast

Postby Daz » Wed Oct 24, 2007 2:58 am

[quote="colm_mcm"]The speedo on the FTO isn't mechanical, so no linkages.

/quote]

Ah well thats good to know, i haven't had to do anything with my speedo but have had to take some out of other cars in my youth so i was going by that, (on a side note i'm glad the old boys in blue don't realise that, i've used wear and tear to get off after being stopped doing 68 in a 60.)

Daz...
Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive, anyway.
18 yrs an owner presently on my 4th a Manual Gpx with twin turbo conversion, in Daytona Blue
User avatar
Daz
Financially Troubled & Overdrawn!
Financially Troubled & Overdrawn!
 
Posts: 1332
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2003 10:47 pm
Location: Ex Carlow - now Liverpool


Return to Off Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron