mark wrote:from my reading I've got the type R as 20kg heavier but 15bhp more and 20 torques more, twin oil coolers and harder dampers than the RB. Info does seem to vary a bit over the net I find with the FDs'.....Yours was a type R right? And was there any particular reason you went with that one, price, model, good nic etc, etc?
Bear in mind that the FD was released in the US and the UK, some of the models didn't appear in the Jap market and vice versa. Power and torque output figures for both models were exacly the same as I understand it, whats important is the year. Cars up to 1997 were rated @ 255bhp, 1997-9 cars were rated @ 265bhp (newer 16-bit ECU) and from 1999 on 280bhp (all Jap figures). Note that theres a Type R1 and R2 (also a Type S, Type X, Touring X, Touring S, Type RZ, Type RS, Type RB, Type RB Bathurst, Type RSR and Spirit R - a, b and c). I have a link somehwhere on the Mazda Rotary Club thats pretty concise on the models - let me dig it out.
The Type R2 (my old model) has twin oil coolers for sure. The reason I went for it was engine compression figures (not to be underestimated) and the fact it had over £1k's worth of work undertaken by a UK rotary expert. Good engine health beats model choice every time.
CJ